IELTS Writing Task 2 is worth twice as much as Task 1 — and it is where most candidates lose or gain the most marks. A Band 6 essay and a Band 7 essay can look similar on the surface, but they differ in four very specific areas that examiners are trained to spot. This guide explains exactly what those areas are, what Band 7+ looks like in practice, and how to get there systematically.
Everything from understanding the four marking criteria to planning, structuring, writing, and reviewing your essay — with a complete Band 7+ sample essay, paragraph templates, and a vocabulary bank. No filler. No vague advice.
📖 Contents
- What Is Task 2?
- The 4 Marking Criteria
- 5 Question Types Explained
- 40-Minute Time Plan
- The 4-Paragraph Essay Structure
- How to Plan in 5 Minutes
- Writing the Introduction
- Writing Body Paragraphs (PEEL)
- Writing the Conclusion
- Full Band 7+ Sample Essay
- Linking & Academic Vocabulary
- Band 5 vs 6 vs 7 vs 8
- Do's and Don'ts
- Pre-Submission Checklist
Section 1
What Is IELTS Writing Task 2?
Task 2 asks you to write a formal discursive essay of at least 250 words in response to a question on a general topic (education, technology, environment, health, society, etc.). You have 40 minutes for this task.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Minimum word count | 250 words (penalties below this) |
| Recommended length | 260–300 words for Band 7 | 280–320 for Band 8+ |
| Time allowed | 40 minutes (suggested; same paper as Task 1) |
| Weighting | ⅔ of your Writing band score (Task 1 = ⅓) |
| Register | Formal and academic — no contractions, no slang |
| First person | Allowed for opinion essays; avoid for Discussion essays |
Section 2
The 4 Marking Criteria (25% Each)
Every Task 2 essay is scored on four equally weighted criteria. Understanding each one tells you exactly where to put your effort.
Most candidates focus almost entirely on vocabulary and grammar. But Task Achievement is where Band 5–6 candidates most commonly lose marks — by misreading the question, giving a partial answer, or having no clear position. Read the question three times before you write a single word.
Section 3
5 Question Types — And How to Identify Each
Before you can write a good essay, you must correctly identify what type of essay the question is asking for. Each type requires a different structure and a different approach to your position.
| Type | Question Signals | Your Job | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion / Agree-Disagree | "To what extent do you agree or disagree?" "Do you agree or disagree?" |
State and defend a clear personal opinion throughout | Fully agree / Fully disagree / Partially agree (pick one clearly) |
| Discussion | "Discuss both views and give your own opinion." | Present both sides fairly, then give your own view | State your opinion in intro and conclusion only |
| Advantages & Disadvantages | "What are the advantages and disadvantages?" "Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?" |
Cover both sides; if "outweigh" — give an overall verdict | Required if "outweigh" is asked; optional otherwise |
| Problem & Solution | "What are the causes of this problem and what solutions can be suggested?" "What problems does this cause and how can they be solved?" |
Identify 2 causes/problems and 2 solutions clearly | Not required — no personal opinion needed |
| Two-Part / Direct Question | "Why is this happening? Is this a positive or negative development?" "What are the reasons? What can be done?" |
Answer both questions fully — missing one = Band 5 maximum for TA | Depends on the second question |
If the question says "Discuss both views and give your own opinion" but you write only your own opinion — you will lose marks on Task Achievement regardless of how good your language is. Always underline the instruction words in the question before planning.
Section 4
The 40-Minute Time Plan
Forty minutes sounds like plenty. It isn't — unless you have a clear plan. Most candidates spend too long writing and have no time to check. Stick to this breakdown:
Candidates who skip planning often write themselves into a corner halfway through Body Paragraph 2 and run out of ideas. Five minutes of thinking saves ten minutes of confused writing — and produces a far more coherent essay.
Section 5
The 4-Paragraph Essay Structure
For most Task 2 question types, a 4-paragraph structure is the safest, clearest, and most examiner-friendly format. It works for Opinion, Discussion, Advantages/Disadvantages, and Two-Part questions.
Sentence 1: Paraphrase the topic (do NOT copy the question word for word).
Sentence 2: Your thesis — state your position or what the essay will cover.
Sentence 3 (optional): Outline — briefly mention the two main points you will discuss.
Topic sentence → state the main point clearly.
Explanation → explain why or how.
Example → give a specific, relevant example.
Link → connect back to the question or your thesis.
Follow the same PEEL structure as Body Paragraph 1.
For Opinion essays: present and concede an opposing view, then refute it.
For Discussion essays: present the second view fairly before giving your opinion in the conclusion.
Sentence 1: Signal the end — "In conclusion," or "To summarise,"
Sentence 2: Restate your position (paraphrase your thesis — do NOT copy it).
Sentence 3 (optional): Final thought, recommendation, or prediction.
A 5-paragraph structure with three body paragraphs spreads your ideas too thin. Each body paragraph only gets ~70 words — not enough to develop an argument properly and demonstrate the depth examiners are looking for. Two well-developed paragraphs always outscore three shallow ones.
Section 6
How to Plan in 5 Minutes
Use this exact approach every time. Do not skip it. Let's use this example question:
"Some people believe that children should be taught to compete, while others think that cooperation is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion."
Step 1 — Identify the Question Type
"Discuss both views and give your own opinion" → This is a Discussion essay. I must cover both sides AND state my view.
Step 2 — Underline Key Words
children, taught to compete, cooperation more important, discuss both views, own opinion.
Step 3 — Brainstorm (2 ideas per paragraph)
| Paragraph | Main Point | Example / Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| BP1: Competition | Prepares children for the competitive adult world (jobs, exams) | University entrance exams; job market competition |
| Builds resilience and self-motivation | Sports teach children to handle defeat | |
| BP2: Cooperation | Most workplace success depends on teamwork | Tech companies, hospitals, construction all require teams |
| Cooperation builds social skills and empathy | Group projects teach listening and compromise | |
| My opinion | Cooperation is more important — but both have a role | State in intro + conclusion |
Step 4 — Write Your Thesis Sentence
"While competitive skills are undeniably useful, I believe that the ability to cooperate is a more fundamental life skill that should be given greater emphasis in education."
This is written before your essay begins — as your planning note. It becomes the core of your introduction and your conclusion.
Section 7
Writing the Introduction
The introduction has one job: tell the examiner clearly what the essay is about and what your position is. It does not need to be impressive or elaborate — it needs to be clear and accurate.
The 3-Sentence Introduction Template
| Sentence | What It Does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sentence 1 | Paraphrase the topic — use synonyms, change the sentence structure | "There is ongoing debate about whether schools should prioritise a competitive mindset or a cooperative one when educating young people." |
| Sentence 2 | Your thesis — your position, stated clearly | "While competitive skills are undeniably useful, I believe that cooperation is a more fundamental life skill and should receive greater emphasis." |
| Sentence 3 | Outline — briefly preview your two main points (optional but helpful) | "This essay will first examine the merits of competition before arguing that collaborative abilities are ultimately more valuable." |
Examiners are trained to ignore any text that is copied directly from the question. If your first sentence is a copy, it does not count toward your word total or your Lexical Resource score. Always paraphrase.
Section 8
Writing Body Paragraphs — The PEEL Method
Every body paragraph should follow the PEEL structure. This gives your paragraphs a logical, examiner-friendly flow and ensures you fully develop each point.
| Letter | Stands For | What to Write | Approx. Sentences |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | Point | Your main argument for this paragraph — one clear, direct statement | 1 sentence |
| E | Explain | Explain why or how — develop the logic behind your point | 2–3 sentences |
| E | Example | A specific, relevant example — real-world, hypothetical, or statistical | 1–2 sentences |
| L | Link | Connect back to the question or your thesis — do not just stop abruptly | 1 sentence |
PEEL in Practice — Body Paragraph 2 (Cooperation)
On the other hand, the ability to cooperate is arguably a more essential skill in the modern world.
ExplainThe vast majority of professional environments — from hospitals and schools to technology companies and construction sites — rely on individuals who can work effectively as part of a team. A person who struggles to collaborate, regardless of their individual talent, will find progress in such environments severely limited. Moreover, cooperation develops empathy and communication skills that competition tends to suppress.
ExampleFor instance, research into high-performing organisations consistently shows that team cohesion and psychological safety are stronger predictors of success than individual ability.
LinkFor these reasons, teaching children to cooperate meaningfully prepares them for the realities of adult professional life in a way that competition alone cannot.
IELTS examiners do not verify your examples for factual accuracy. You can write "research suggests…" or "studies have shown…" without citing a specific source. What matters is that your example is relevant, specific, and well-integrated into your argument — not whether the statistic is real.
Section 9
Writing the Conclusion
The conclusion is the shortest paragraph and has the clearest job: close the essay and restate your position. It should introduce no new ideas or new evidence.
Conclusion Template
| Sentence | Function | Example Phrase |
|---|---|---|
| Opening signal | Tell the examiner the essay is ending | "In conclusion," / "To conclude," / "To summarise," |
| Restate position | Paraphrase your thesis — do NOT copy it word for word | "…although competitive instincts have clear value, I remain convinced that collaborative skills are of greater importance for young people's long-term development." |
| Final thought | Recommendation, prediction, or broader implication (optional) | "Ideally, schools should strike a balance, incorporating both approaches to produce well-rounded individuals." |
Section 10
Full Band 7+ Sample Essay (with Annotations)
Below is a complete Band 7+ essay for the competition vs cooperation question. Highlighted phrases show Band 7+ vocabulary and structure choices.
There is ongoing debate about whether schools should prioritise fostering a competitive mindset or a cooperative one in young learners. While both approaches carry undeniable merit, I believe that the ability to collaborate with others is ultimately the more vital skill for modern life, and should therefore be given greater emphasis in education. This essay will examine arguments for both perspectives before presenting my own view.
Body Paragraph 1 — Competition — 100 wordsProponents of competition argue that it prepares children for the realities of adult life, where individuals must frequently compete for limited resources such as university places and employment opportunities. Exposure to competitive environments from an early age can build resilience, self-motivation, and the ability to perform under pressure — qualities that are highly valued in professional settings. For example, students who participate in academic competitions or competitive sports often develop greater determination and a stronger work ethic than those who do not. Consequently, there is a compelling case for incorporating competition into children's education.
Body Paragraph 2 — Cooperation — 107 wordsOn the other hand, the ability to cooperate is arguably a more essential life skill in the contemporary world. The vast majority of professional environments — from hospitals and schools to technology firms and construction sites — depend on individuals who can work effectively as part of a team. A person who is highly competitive but struggles to collaborate will inevitably find their progress limited in such contexts. Furthermore, cooperation cultivates empathy, active listening, and the capacity to compromise — interpersonal qualities that competition often suppresses. Research into high-performing organisations consistently identifies team cohesion as a stronger predictor of success than individual ability alone.
Conclusion — 57 wordsIn conclusion, while I acknowledge that competitive skills have a valuable role in preparing young people for the challenges ahead, I remain convinced that the ability to cooperate is the more fundamental and widely applicable life skill. Ideally, schools should incorporate both approaches, ensuring that students develop not only ambition but also the social intelligence required to thrive in collaborative environments.
Word count: 329 words | Estimated Band: 7–7.5
| Criterion | What This Essay Does Well |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement | Both views discussed; clear opinion stated in intro and conclusion; all parts of the question addressed |
| Coherence & Cohesion | Clear 4-paragraph structure; linking words used accurately ("On the other hand", "Consequently", "Furthermore"); no abrupt jumps |
| Lexical Resource | Range of academic vocabulary: "proponents", "resilience", "cultivates", "interpersonal", "cohesion"; no repetition of basic words |
| Grammatical Range | Mix of complex sentence structures; relative clauses, passive constructions, conditional implication; very few errors |
Section 11
Linking & Academic Vocabulary Bank
Linking Words by Function
| Function | Useful Phrases |
|---|---|
| Adding a point | Furthermore, Moreover, In addition, Additionally, What is more |
| Contrasting | However, On the other hand, Nevertheless, Despite this, Conversely, Notwithstanding |
| Giving a reason | This is because, due to the fact that, as a result of, owing to |
| Giving a result | Therefore, Consequently, As a result, Hence, Thus, This leads to |
| Giving an example | For instance, For example, To illustrate, A case in point is, Such as |
| Conceding a point | Admittedly, It is true that, While it is acknowledged that, Despite the fact that |
| Concluding | In conclusion, To conclude, To summarise, On balance, Taking everything into consideration |
Academic Vocabulary to Upgrade Common Words
Section 12
What Separates Band 5 / 6 / 7 / 8
| Criterion | Band 5 | Band 6 | Band 7 | Band 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task Achievement | Addresses the topic but misses parts of the task; unclear position | Addresses all parts but position may be unclear or underdeveloped | All parts addressed; clear position throughout; main ideas extended and supported | All parts fully and relevantly addressed; position is nuanced and well-defended |
| Coherence & Cohesion | Some organisation; ideas may be difficult to follow; linking overused or mechanical | Organised with clear paragraphs; cohesive devices used, sometimes inaccurately | Logical progression; variety of cohesive devices used accurately; central topic is clear | Seamless, skilful use of cohesion; paragraphing is always appropriate |
| Lexical Resource | Limited range; errors in word choice affect communication | Adequate vocabulary; some attempts at less common words; noticeable errors | Sufficient range; some less common vocabulary with awareness of style; only minor errors | Wide range used flexibly and precisely; rare and minor errors only |
| Grammar | Limited range; mostly simple sentences; frequent errors | Mix of simple and complex structures; some errors but meaning is clear | Variety of complex structures; good control of grammar; only occasional errors | Wide range; most sentences error-free; errors are only occasional slips |
Section 13
Do's and Don'ts for Band 7+
- Read and underline key words in the question before writing
- Spend 5 minutes planning your two main ideas
- Paraphrase the question in your introduction
- State your position clearly in the introduction
- Use PEEL structure in every body paragraph
- Give specific examples, even hypothetical ones
- Use a variety of linking words — not just "firstly, secondly"
- Write in formal register throughout
- Check your essay for grammar and spelling in the last 3–4 minutes
- Write at least 250 words — aim for 270–300
- Copy the question into your introduction
- Use contractions (don't, can't, it's)
- Use informal language (kids, lots of, a lot, stuff)
- Use bullet points or numbered lists — write in paragraphs
- Start every sentence with a linking word — it becomes mechanical
- Introduce new ideas in the conclusion
- Write fewer than 250 words — marks are deducted
- Repeat your thesis sentence word-for-word in the conclusion
- Give only one side for a Discussion question
- Give personal stories ("In my village…", "My father says…")
Section 14
Pre-Submission Checklist
Run through this in the final 3–4 minutes. One pass can gain you half a band.
| # | Check | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Word count | Is it at least 250 words? Count if unsure. |
| 2 | Question type | Have I answered ALL parts of the task? |
| 3 | Position | Is my opinion clearly stated and consistent throughout? |
| 4 | Introduction | Does it paraphrase (not copy) the question and state my thesis? |
| 5 | Paragraph structure | Does each body paragraph have a topic sentence, explanation, and example? |
| 6 | Conclusion | Does it summarise without adding new ideas? |
| 7 | Subject-verb agreement | "The government is" not "the government are" |
| 8 | Articles | Check a/an/the — especially before nouns |
| 9 | Register | Any contractions or informal words? Remove them. |
| 10 | Spelling | Check the words you know you sometimes misspell |
⚡ Task 2 Master Quick Reference
| Topic | Key Rule / Formula |
|---|---|
| Word count | Minimum 250 — aim for 270–300 |
| Time plan | 5 min plan → 10 min intro → 20 min body → 5 min conclusion + check |
| Paragraphs | 4 paragraphs: Intro → BP1 → BP2 → Conclusion |
| Body paragraph | PEEL: Point → Explain → Example → Link |
| Introduction | Paraphrase topic + thesis + optional outline (no copied text) |
| Conclusion | Restate position + final thought (no new ideas) |
| Opinion question | State your view clearly — and maintain it throughout |
| Discussion question | Both sides fairly + your opinion in intro and conclusion |
| Register | Formal always — no contractions, no slang, no personal anecdotes |
| Vocabulary | Vary your synonyms; avoid repeating the same noun/verb more than twice |
| Examples | Specific and integrated — not verified for factual accuracy by examiners |
| Linking words | Vary them; do not start every sentence with a linker |
Summary
- Task 2 is worth twice Task 1 — give it 40 minutes and treat it as the priority.
- The 4 marking criteria each carry 25% — neglect any one of them and your band drops.
- Identify the question type first — it determines your entire structure and approach.
- Always spend 5 minutes planning before you write a single word.
- Use a 4-paragraph structure and the PEEL method for body paragraphs — every time.
- Paraphrase the question in your introduction — never copy it.
- Band 7 is achievable for most learners with a structured approach — it is not about genius, it is about system.