IELTS Writing Task 2 is worth twice as much as Task 1 — and it is where most candidates lose or gain the most marks. A Band 6 essay and a Band 7 essay can look similar on the surface, but they differ in four very specific areas that examiners are trained to spot. This guide explains exactly what those areas are, what Band 7+ looks like in practice, and how to get there systematically.

📌 What This Guide Covers

Everything from understanding the four marking criteria to planning, structuring, writing, and reviewing your essay — with a complete Band 7+ sample essay, paragraph templates, and a vocabulary bank. No filler. No vague advice.

Section 1
What Is IELTS Writing Task 2?

Task 2 asks you to write a formal discursive essay of at least 250 words in response to a question on a general topic (education, technology, environment, health, society, etc.). You have 40 minutes for this task.

FeatureDetails
Minimum word count250 words (penalties below this)
Recommended length260–300 words for Band 7 | 280–320 for Band 8+
Time allowed40 minutes (suggested; same paper as Task 1)
Weighting⅔ of your Writing band score (Task 1 = ⅓)
RegisterFormal and academic — no contractions, no slang
First personAllowed for opinion essays; avoid for Discussion essays

Section 2
The 4 Marking Criteria (25% Each)

Every Task 2 essay is scored on four equally weighted criteria. Understanding each one tells you exactly where to put your effort.

25%
Task Achievement (TA)
Did you fully answer the question? Did you cover all parts of the task with a clear position?
25%
Coherence & Cohesion (CC)
Is your essay logically organised? Do ideas flow smoothly with correct linking words and paragraphing?
25%
Lexical Resource (LR)
Do you use a wide, accurate, and appropriate range of vocabulary? Can you paraphrase naturally?
25%
Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA)
Do you use a variety of sentence structures accurately, including complex sentences?
💡 The Most Neglected Criterion

Most candidates focus almost entirely on vocabulary and grammar. But Task Achievement is where Band 5–6 candidates most commonly lose marks — by misreading the question, giving a partial answer, or having no clear position. Read the question three times before you write a single word.

Section 3
5 Question Types — And How to Identify Each

Before you can write a good essay, you must correctly identify what type of essay the question is asking for. Each type requires a different structure and a different approach to your position.

TypeQuestion SignalsYour JobPosition
Opinion / Agree-Disagree "To what extent do you agree or disagree?"
"Do you agree or disagree?"
State and defend a clear personal opinion throughout Fully agree / Fully disagree / Partially agree (pick one clearly)
Discussion "Discuss both views and give your own opinion." Present both sides fairly, then give your own view State your opinion in intro and conclusion only
Advantages & Disadvantages "What are the advantages and disadvantages?"
"Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?"
Cover both sides; if "outweigh" — give an overall verdict Required if "outweigh" is asked; optional otherwise
Problem & Solution "What are the causes of this problem and what solutions can be suggested?"
"What problems does this cause and how can they be solved?"
Identify 2 causes/problems and 2 solutions clearly Not required — no personal opinion needed
Two-Part / Direct Question "Why is this happening? Is this a positive or negative development?"
"What are the reasons? What can be done?"
Answer both questions fully — missing one = Band 5 maximum for TA Depends on the second question
⚠️ The Most Dangerous Mistake: Misidentifying the Question Type

If the question says "Discuss both views and give your own opinion" but you write only your own opinion — you will lose marks on Task Achievement regardless of how good your language is. Always underline the instruction words in the question before planning.

Section 4
The 40-Minute Time Plan

Forty minutes sounds like plenty. It isn't — unless you have a clear plan. Most candidates spend too long writing and have no time to check. Stick to this breakdown:

5'
Read & Plan
Identify type, underline keywords, brainstorm 2 ideas per paragraph
10'
Introduction
Paraphrase topic + thesis statement (2–3 sentences, ~60 words)
20'
Body Paragraphs
10 min per paragraph — Point, Explain, Example, Link
5'
Conclusion + Check
Summarise + restate position, then check grammar & spelling
💡 The 5-Minute Plan Is Non-Negotiable

Candidates who skip planning often write themselves into a corner halfway through Body Paragraph 2 and run out of ideas. Five minutes of thinking saves ten minutes of confused writing — and produces a far more coherent essay.

Section 5
The 4-Paragraph Essay Structure

For most Task 2 question types, a 4-paragraph structure is the safest, clearest, and most examiner-friendly format. It works for Opinion, Discussion, Advantages/Disadvantages, and Two-Part questions.

1️⃣
Introduction

Sentence 1: Paraphrase the topic (do NOT copy the question word for word).
Sentence 2: Your thesis — state your position or what the essay will cover.
Sentence 3 (optional): Outline — briefly mention the two main points you will discuss.

Target: 55–70 words
2️⃣
Body Paragraph 1 — Main Argument / First View / Advantage / Cause

Topic sentence → state the main point clearly.
Explanation → explain why or how.
Example → give a specific, relevant example.
Link → connect back to the question or your thesis.

Target: 90–110 words
3️⃣
Body Paragraph 2 — Counter-Argument / Second View / Disadvantage / Solution

Follow the same PEEL structure as Body Paragraph 1.
For Opinion essays: present and concede an opposing view, then refute it.
For Discussion essays: present the second view fairly before giving your opinion in the conclusion.

Target: 90–110 words
4️⃣
Conclusion

Sentence 1: Signal the end — "In conclusion," or "To summarise,"
Sentence 2: Restate your position (paraphrase your thesis — do NOT copy it).
Sentence 3 (optional): Final thought, recommendation, or prediction.

Target: 45–60 words
⚠️ Never Write a 5-Paragraph Essay for Task 2

A 5-paragraph structure with three body paragraphs spreads your ideas too thin. Each body paragraph only gets ~70 words — not enough to develop an argument properly and demonstrate the depth examiners are looking for. Two well-developed paragraphs always outscore three shallow ones.

Section 6
How to Plan in 5 Minutes

Use this exact approach every time. Do not skip it. Let's use this example question:

📝 Example Question

"Some people believe that children should be taught to compete, while others think that cooperation is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion."

Step 1 — Identify the Question Type

"Discuss both views and give your own opinion" → This is a Discussion essay. I must cover both sides AND state my view.

Step 2 — Underline Key Words

children, taught to compete, cooperation more important, discuss both views, own opinion.

Step 3 — Brainstorm (2 ideas per paragraph)

ParagraphMain PointExample / Evidence
BP1: CompetitionPrepares children for the competitive adult world (jobs, exams)University entrance exams; job market competition
Builds resilience and self-motivationSports teach children to handle defeat
BP2: CooperationMost workplace success depends on teamworkTech companies, hospitals, construction all require teams
Cooperation builds social skills and empathyGroup projects teach listening and compromise
My opinionCooperation is more important — but both have a roleState in intro + conclusion

Step 4 — Write Your Thesis Sentence

"While competitive skills are undeniably useful, I believe that the ability to cooperate is a more fundamental life skill that should be given greater emphasis in education."

This is written before your essay begins — as your planning note. It becomes the core of your introduction and your conclusion.

Section 7
Writing the Introduction

The introduction has one job: tell the examiner clearly what the essay is about and what your position is. It does not need to be impressive or elaborate — it needs to be clear and accurate.

The 3-Sentence Introduction Template

SentenceWhat It DoesExample
Sentence 1 Paraphrase the topic — use synonyms, change the sentence structure "There is ongoing debate about whether schools should prioritise a competitive mindset or a cooperative one when educating young people."
Sentence 2 Your thesis — your position, stated clearly "While competitive skills are undeniably useful, I believe that cooperation is a more fundamental life skill and should receive greater emphasis."
Sentence 3 Outline — briefly preview your two main points (optional but helpful) "This essay will first examine the merits of competition before arguing that collaborative abilities are ultimately more valuable."
⚠️ Never Copy the Question — It Is Not Scored

Examiners are trained to ignore any text that is copied directly from the question. If your first sentence is a copy, it does not count toward your word total or your Lexical Resource score. Always paraphrase.

Section 8
Writing Body Paragraphs — The PEEL Method

Every body paragraph should follow the PEEL structure. This gives your paragraphs a logical, examiner-friendly flow and ensures you fully develop each point.

LetterStands ForWhat to WriteApprox. Sentences
P Point Your main argument for this paragraph — one clear, direct statement 1 sentence
E Explain Explain why or how — develop the logic behind your point 2–3 sentences
E Example A specific, relevant example — real-world, hypothetical, or statistical 1–2 sentences
L Link Connect back to the question or your thesis — do not just stop abruptly 1 sentence

PEEL in Practice — Body Paragraph 2 (Cooperation)

Point

On the other hand, the ability to cooperate is arguably a more essential skill in the modern world.

Explain

The vast majority of professional environments — from hospitals and schools to technology companies and construction sites — rely on individuals who can work effectively as part of a team. A person who struggles to collaborate, regardless of their individual talent, will find progress in such environments severely limited. Moreover, cooperation develops empathy and communication skills that competition tends to suppress.

Example

For instance, research into high-performing organisations consistently shows that team cohesion and psychological safety are stronger predictors of success than individual ability.

Link

For these reasons, teaching children to cooperate meaningfully prepares them for the realities of adult professional life in a way that competition alone cannot.

💡 On Examples: They Do Not Need to Be Factual

IELTS examiners do not verify your examples for factual accuracy. You can write "research suggests…" or "studies have shown…" without citing a specific source. What matters is that your example is relevant, specific, and well-integrated into your argument — not whether the statistic is real.

Section 9
Writing the Conclusion

The conclusion is the shortest paragraph and has the clearest job: close the essay and restate your position. It should introduce no new ideas or new evidence.

Conclusion Template

SentenceFunctionExample Phrase
Opening signal Tell the examiner the essay is ending "In conclusion," / "To conclude," / "To summarise,"
Restate position Paraphrase your thesis — do NOT copy it word for word "…although competitive instincts have clear value, I remain convinced that collaborative skills are of greater importance for young people's long-term development."
Final thought Recommendation, prediction, or broader implication (optional) "Ideally, schools should strike a balance, incorporating both approaches to produce well-rounded individuals."

Section 10
Full Band 7+ Sample Essay (with Annotations)

Below is a complete Band 7+ essay for the competition vs cooperation question. Highlighted phrases show Band 7+ vocabulary and structure choices.

Introduction — 65 words

There is ongoing debate about whether schools should prioritise fostering a competitive mindset or a cooperative one in young learners. While both approaches carry undeniable merit, I believe that the ability to collaborate with others is ultimately the more vital skill for modern life, and should therefore be given greater emphasis in education. This essay will examine arguments for both perspectives before presenting my own view.

Body Paragraph 1 — Competition — 100 words

Proponents of competition argue that it prepares children for the realities of adult life, where individuals must frequently compete for limited resources such as university places and employment opportunities. Exposure to competitive environments from an early age can build resilience, self-motivation, and the ability to perform under pressure — qualities that are highly valued in professional settings. For example, students who participate in academic competitions or competitive sports often develop greater determination and a stronger work ethic than those who do not. Consequently, there is a compelling case for incorporating competition into children's education.

Body Paragraph 2 — Cooperation — 107 words

On the other hand, the ability to cooperate is arguably a more essential life skill in the contemporary world. The vast majority of professional environments — from hospitals and schools to technology firms and construction sites — depend on individuals who can work effectively as part of a team. A person who is highly competitive but struggles to collaborate will inevitably find their progress limited in such contexts. Furthermore, cooperation cultivates empathy, active listening, and the capacity to compromise — interpersonal qualities that competition often suppresses. Research into high-performing organisations consistently identifies team cohesion as a stronger predictor of success than individual ability alone.

Conclusion — 57 words

In conclusion, while I acknowledge that competitive skills have a valuable role in preparing young people for the challenges ahead, I remain convinced that the ability to cooperate is the more fundamental and widely applicable life skill. Ideally, schools should incorporate both approaches, ensuring that students develop not only ambition but also the social intelligence required to thrive in collaborative environments.

Word count: 329 words  |  Estimated Band: 7–7.5

CriterionWhat This Essay Does Well
Task AchievementBoth views discussed; clear opinion stated in intro and conclusion; all parts of the question addressed
Coherence & CohesionClear 4-paragraph structure; linking words used accurately ("On the other hand", "Consequently", "Furthermore"); no abrupt jumps
Lexical ResourceRange of academic vocabulary: "proponents", "resilience", "cultivates", "interpersonal", "cohesion"; no repetition of basic words
Grammatical RangeMix of complex sentence structures; relative clauses, passive constructions, conditional implication; very few errors

Section 11
Linking & Academic Vocabulary Bank

Linking Words by Function

FunctionUseful Phrases
Adding a pointFurthermore, Moreover, In addition, Additionally, What is more
ContrastingHowever, On the other hand, Nevertheless, Despite this, Conversely, Notwithstanding
Giving a reasonThis is because, due to the fact that, as a result of, owing to
Giving a resultTherefore, Consequently, As a result, Hence, Thus, This leads to
Giving an exampleFor instance, For example, To illustrate, A case in point is, Such as
Conceding a pointAdmittedly, It is true that, While it is acknowledged that, Despite the fact that
ConcludingIn conclusion, To conclude, To summarise, On balance, Taking everything into consideration

Academic Vocabulary to Upgrade Common Words

argue → contend / assert / maintain
For stating your view or others' views
"Proponents of this view contend that…"
show → demonstrate / illustrate / reveal
For introducing evidence or examples
"Research has consistently demonstrated that…"
important → significant / crucial / paramount / fundamental
For emphasising importance
"This is a fundamental consideration in education."
bad → detrimental / harmful / adverse / counterproductive
For negative effects
"This can have a detrimental impact on wellbeing."
good → beneficial / advantageous / conducive to
For positive effects
"This is conducive to long-term economic growth."
people → individuals / society / the population / stakeholders
For referring to groups without repetition
"Individuals from all backgrounds stand to benefit."
many → a significant number of / a considerable proportion of
For quantity without using "a lot of" (informal)
"A considerable proportion of young people today…"
think → believe / consider / recognise / acknowledge
For opinion verbs with more precision
"I acknowledge that this view has some merit, however…"

Section 12
What Separates Band 5 / 6 / 7 / 8

5
Modest
6
Competent
7
Good
8
Very Good
9
Expert
CriterionBand 5Band 6Band 7Band 8
Task Achievement Addresses the topic but misses parts of the task; unclear position Addresses all parts but position may be unclear or underdeveloped All parts addressed; clear position throughout; main ideas extended and supported All parts fully and relevantly addressed; position is nuanced and well-defended
Coherence & Cohesion Some organisation; ideas may be difficult to follow; linking overused or mechanical Organised with clear paragraphs; cohesive devices used, sometimes inaccurately Logical progression; variety of cohesive devices used accurately; central topic is clear Seamless, skilful use of cohesion; paragraphing is always appropriate
Lexical Resource Limited range; errors in word choice affect communication Adequate vocabulary; some attempts at less common words; noticeable errors Sufficient range; some less common vocabulary with awareness of style; only minor errors Wide range used flexibly and precisely; rare and minor errors only
Grammar Limited range; mostly simple sentences; frequent errors Mix of simple and complex structures; some errors but meaning is clear Variety of complex structures; good control of grammar; only occasional errors Wide range; most sentences error-free; errors are only occasional slips

Section 13
Do's and Don'ts for Band 7+

✅ Always Do
  • Read and underline key words in the question before writing
  • Spend 5 minutes planning your two main ideas
  • Paraphrase the question in your introduction
  • State your position clearly in the introduction
  • Use PEEL structure in every body paragraph
  • Give specific examples, even hypothetical ones
  • Use a variety of linking words — not just "firstly, secondly"
  • Write in formal register throughout
  • Check your essay for grammar and spelling in the last 3–4 minutes
  • Write at least 250 words — aim for 270–300
❌ Never Do
  • Copy the question into your introduction
  • Use contractions (don't, can't, it's)
  • Use informal language (kids, lots of, a lot, stuff)
  • Use bullet points or numbered lists — write in paragraphs
  • Start every sentence with a linking word — it becomes mechanical
  • Introduce new ideas in the conclusion
  • Write fewer than 250 words — marks are deducted
  • Repeat your thesis sentence word-for-word in the conclusion
  • Give only one side for a Discussion question
  • Give personal stories ("In my village…", "My father says…")

Section 14
Pre-Submission Checklist

Run through this in the final 3–4 minutes. One pass can gain you half a band.

#CheckWhat to Look For
1Word countIs it at least 250 words? Count if unsure.
2Question typeHave I answered ALL parts of the task?
3PositionIs my opinion clearly stated and consistent throughout?
4IntroductionDoes it paraphrase (not copy) the question and state my thesis?
5Paragraph structureDoes each body paragraph have a topic sentence, explanation, and example?
6ConclusionDoes it summarise without adding new ideas?
7Subject-verb agreement"The government is" not "the government are"
8ArticlesCheck a/an/the — especially before nouns
9RegisterAny contractions or informal words? Remove them.
10SpellingCheck the words you know you sometimes misspell

⚡ Task 2 Master Quick Reference

TopicKey Rule / Formula
Word countMinimum 250 — aim for 270–300
Time plan5 min plan → 10 min intro → 20 min body → 5 min conclusion + check
Paragraphs4 paragraphs: Intro → BP1 → BP2 → Conclusion
Body paragraphPEEL: Point → Explain → Example → Link
IntroductionParaphrase topic + thesis + optional outline (no copied text)
ConclusionRestate position + final thought (no new ideas)
Opinion questionState your view clearly — and maintain it throughout
Discussion questionBoth sides fairly + your opinion in intro and conclusion
RegisterFormal always — no contractions, no slang, no personal anecdotes
VocabularyVary your synonyms; avoid repeating the same noun/verb more than twice
ExamplesSpecific and integrated — not verified for factual accuracy by examiners
Linking wordsVary them; do not start every sentence with a linker

Summary